SHI-SHA-SHIA-SHIFA-SHIF: A New Age of Social Healthcare!
The pace towards Universal Health coverage is
fastening as the current regime is intending to deliver its share of mandate by
building from the MTPIII/Big Four Agenda’s healthcare achievements. While KK
regime is steadfast in effecting healthcare changes, the government is yet to
dissipate the abounding circulating confusions, confusion founded on numerous
questions on the ongoing rapid transition of healthcare financing system from
the previous National Health Insurance Fund Act, 1998 to the new Social Health
Insurance Act, 2023. Questions such as why the impetuous operationalization of
the Social Health Authority. In fact, it is hardly comprehensible that the institution
has not been fully established to undertake its mandate as per the SHI Act. Concerns
such as why can’t the health authorities attain the same outcomes aimed to be
achieved by the new frameworks with the National Health Insurance Fund? Questions
such as how what exactly does means testing instrument, a mechanism that the
authorities intends to employ in determining level of income earned by
unsalaried Kenyans especially those who work in the informal sectors? The Boda Boda rider, the mama mboga, Jamaa Wa
mkokoteni inter alia. But before I get ahead and by, it is important to
understand some context.
Rationale
for the new SHIA
Last year, 2023, Kenya marked an outstanding step in
its progressive healthcare policy reforms following a successful passage of the
Social Health Insurance Act, No. 16 of 2023. This watershed legislation
repealed the former National Health Insurance Act of 1998, an Act that had
undergone through several reviews before it got repealed by the current SHIA. In
the spirit of having effective and efficient healthcare financing system in
order to achieve long-term ambition of Universal Health Coverage. Moi’s regime hallmarked
healthcare policy legislation by assenting an Act that anchored an array of
policy frameworks, notably that established the National Health Insurance Fund
in 1988. Although, the Act had undergone through series of reviews, the Fund
had been embroiled in myriad of institutional challenges that road blocked its
ability to deliver its constitutional mandate of ensuring affordable healthcare
financing. It was not immune from endemic corruption, a deep-rooted problems
that has affected most government institutions. It is inarguable that beneficiaries
of NHIF faced challenges in accessing Fund’s cover in hospitals whenever they
feel sick. In light of aiming to address
managerial and institutional shortfalls of this Fund, parliament enacted a new
legislation, Social Health Insurance Act which sought to repeal the pre-existing
fund and replace it with a new model of public healthcare financing, and
introducing other new funds.
Legal frameworks:
In recognition that good health is a fundamental
necessity for the country’s economic prosperity, the framers of the
constitution of Kenya 2010 through Article 43 mandate the government with a
responsibility of ensuring that there is high standard healthcare accessed by
the population of Kenya. Further, in the long-term plan of vision 2030,
government intends to make highest attainable healthcare into reality by the
year 2030. Uhuru’s government and current regime has made remarkable steps in institutional
health policy reforms through their political agendas; The Big Four and the
Bottom up Economic Transformative Agenda. Both of them designed to achieve Universal
Healthcare coverage. KK regime’s five-pillared economic strategy envisaged
Universal Healthcare Coverage as one of its main priorities for the next five years
and recent last year’s passage of new social Health Insurance Act has showcased
their commitment to continue with previous government efforts to leap up previous
regimes’ efforts of improving healthcare financing.
PHF SHIF and ECCIF
In particular, the new Social
Health Insurance Act, 2023 establishes three main fund which will managed by
Social Health Authority, SHA.
1.
Social Health Insurance Fund {SHIF}, is the successor of NHIF. This fund is primarily
aimed at providing health coverage to registered beneficiaries including
all Kenyan household and foreigners with long-term residency in the country.
The fund will be majorly funded by 2.7% contributions by registered salaried income
and annual contribution from unsalaried Kenyan households through a mechanism
determined by the accounting officer of ministry of health. The Act mentions
the mechanism as a means testing instrument. While the act state that, the
cabinet secretary has not provided specificity on the means testing instrument that
will be used to determine the annual income of unsalaried households. Other sources
of resources include monies appropriated by the National Assembly for indigent
and vulnerable person and gifts, grants, innovative financing mechanisms or
donations.
2. Primary
Health Fund (PHF): This is one is primary designed to
purchase primary healthcare services from healthcare facilities. It will derive
funding from sources including appropriations from national assembly, grants,
donations and fees. This is one is objected towards seamless delivery of
critical primary health services to the population. As it stands that government
aimed to pump Kenya 50B but national assembly has only appropriated 4B.
3. Emergency,
Chronic, and Critical Illness Fund (ECCIF): If you are a beneficiary of SHIF
and your contribution are exhausted, this fund is dedicated to cover costs associated
with treating chronic illness and emergency health concerns. Like SHIF and PHC,
it is also funded by Nation assembly’s appropriations, grants, and donations.
Kenyans’ take
In defiance of these ambitious institutional
reforms, the operationalization of the transitioning Act has sparked mixed
reactions and fuelled a raging public discourse about the country’s social health
insurance policy. Most Kenyans express their scepticism about the transitioning
from National Insurance Health Fund (NHIF) into Social Health Insurance Fund (SHIF),
majorly scrutinizing the sense urgency in its implementation. The government has
hurriedly migrated Kenyans into SHIF despite serious institutional gaps that
have not been established in the general regulations, 2024. The quick moves
have left Kenyans questioning the genuineness of this transition
and whether these changes will effectively and efficiently improve healthcare
security in this country.
As many
Kenyans grapple with unanswered questions regarding justification and rationale
for these changes, the government persuades
that establishment of primary health fund, social health insurance fund and emergency
chronic and critical illness fund are dedicated to improving healthcare towards achieving ultimate ambition of
Universal Health Coverage envisaged in government long-term plan, constitution of Kenya,
Medium plan Four, sector master plans, sustainable development goals and other regional
development plans relevant to country’s healthcare priorities.
As the country is sailing through this transformative
metamorphic phase in its healthcare outlook, it is important for Kenyans to keep
themselves informed and understand implication of this new act. It is fundamentally
important to engage in discourses with the aim of challenging policy makers by providing
feedbacks and participating in processes that ensure that your healthcare plans
are safe and secure.
Comments